There is a version of a business where you build a body of work that is unmistakably yours. 

Not just recognized, but protected. 

In that version, you build with the confidence of someone who knows the thing she has poured years into can’t be touched.. Most experts assume that kind of security is something to think about later, once the business is big enough to warrant it. 

Recently I had the opportunity to  sat down with intellectual property attorney Berkley Sweetapple on the Soulful CEO path  who made the case that laying theifoundation early, and owning your brand (not just building one) is more urgent than most founders realize.

For someone who has likely spent years  mastering your craft, this is not just a legal formality. 

It is the difference between a body of work that’s protected and can scale with you and one that’s not. 

Owning Your IP Means Control

The first reframe worth holding is what IP ownership actually means. 

It is not a certificate you display. It’s  control. The ability to decide whether someone can copy your work, to be compensated if they do, and to hold the exclusive right to use your name in your industry. A registered trademark, along with copyright on the assets you create, is what turns a name you use into a name you own.

This is the part most experts skip past. They think about ownership in terms of brand and language, the words they have built a reputation around. Far fewer are thinking about the mechanism that actually secures those words, which is why the topic tends to surface only after something goes wrong. Understanding that ownership is control, and that control has to be claimed rather than assumed, is where the real shift begins.

You Can’t Always Trademark The Name You Want & Why You Should Get Help

I learned this one the hard way. In my first business I was licencing a program called Whole Life Leadership and tried to save money by doing the trademark application on my own. Not a good idea.

Long story short it got denied.

Some names are far easier to protect than others, and the ones that describe what you do plainly are often the hardest to own, because the law is reluctant to hand any one person exclusive rights to ordinary descriptive language. A more distinctive name is not just better branding. It is more defensible. 

This is also why doing it yourself is one of the most common ways an application fails. An attorney can run a proper search before you file, catch a conflict that would sink you, and argue a refusal back into an approval in ways a founder working alone rarely can.

For an expert who is still crystallizing her signature approach, this reframes the naming decision entirely. The best time to think about whether a name is ownable is while you are still choosing it, not years after you have built your whole reputation on it.

The Right Time to Trademark Is Earlier Than You Think

The most common objection sounds reasonable. That is for big businesses. I will get to it one day. Berkley’s answer she shared on the podcast is a simple test that cuts through it… 

If you have a name you love and would be genuinely upset to lose, that is the name to protect, and usually earlier than instinct suggests. Her recommendation is to do it around the time the work becomes public, ideally before you have built years of recognition on top of something you do not yet own.

The economics back this up. Most founders invest well past the cost of a trademark on branding, photography, website design, and everything else that makes a launch feel real. Building all of that on a name you do not own is building on borrowed ground, and borrowed ground can be reclaimed with a single cease and desist letter, taking your customer recognition with it. 

The point is not to trademark everything. It is to protect the handful of things you would refuse to give up.

You Can Own More Than Your Name

Beyond the business name, more of your body of work is protectable than most people assume. Distinctive logos, taglines, event and mastermind names, and the offers you know are core to your business can all be secured. So can your signature methodology, with one important condition. You cannot trademark a method name if it lives only as an idea in a book. It becomes ownable when it functions as the name of an actual offer, a course or program or masterclass, so that it identifies the source of something you sell rather than simply describing a concept.

If your work is anchored in a named method, the difference between a framework anyone can borrow and a signature offer that is legally, unmistakably yours is this.

Protection Is Really About Permission

The deeper reason to do this early has less to do with law and more to do with how you lead. 

When the foundation underneath your business is solid, you stop operating from a subtle fear of doing something wrong or getting copied, and you start showing up with the confidence to be visible, raise your rates, and play at the level you are reaching for. 

With this lens, legal foundations like trademarking are less about paperwork and more about permission. They are what let you step into the identity of the CEO your business is growing into, before you are technically there, rather than scrambling to patch the foundation every time you reach a new level.

That is the real invitation in this conversation. Not fear, and not a rush to protect something you have not built yet, but the decision to build the next thing on ground you actually own. Start with the name you would hate to lose. That is almost always the place to begin.

Listen to the full episode with Berkley Sweetapple on Episode 47 of The Soulful CEO Podcast.

Listen Here: 

Want more conversations like this in real-time?

Join KNOWN. Kristin’s free community where established experts turn mastery into method and build businesses that scale their impact & make them millions.

Join here